November 28 - India will not boycott the London 2012 Olympics over Dow Chemical's sponsorship of the Games,  the acting President of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) Vijay Kumar Malhotra (pictured) has promised.

Dow are one of 11 worldwide Olympic Partners and speculation has been growing that India will pull out of London 2012 due to the fact that Dow bought US chemical firm Union Carbide whose Bhopal plant in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh leaked toxic gases in 1984, killing thousands of people in the world's worst industrial accident.

Following the Bhopal disaster, Union Carbide settled its liabilities with the Indian Government in 1989 by paying $470 million (£310 million/€351 million) for Bhopal victims and even though Dow bought Union Carbide a decade after the compensation deal, the company has been put in the firing line for its sponsorship of a temporary £7 million (£11 million/€8 million) wrap that will encase the London 2012 Olympic Stadium in Stratford.

But Malhotra, the IOA senior vice-president who is acting President as Suresh Kalmadi was arrested earlier this year due to alleged corruption in awarding contracts for the 2010 Commonwealth Games, said that there is no planned boycott from the team, as had been reported in some British newspapers.

"We are meeting next week but it's not about boycotting the Games," said Malhotra told Reuters.

"Some people have raised a concern about the sponsorship issue and we will discuss that, along with some other issues.

"Some former Olympians are upset with the sponsorship deal and would like them [London 2012] to reconsider it."

The Indian Government is still pursuing an additional $1.1 billion (£707 million/€822 million) from Dow for victims despite the settlement from Union Carbide

Around 3,000 people died in the initial disaster, but a further 15,000 have since died from poisoning.

Dow's Olympic sponsorship has caused anger across particularly in Madhya Pradesh where senior figures, including chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, stating that instead of sponsoring the Games, the company should spend the money on Bhopal survivors.

But both the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and London 2012 have backed Dow, who has been a supporter of the Olympic Movement for more than 30 years.

The IOC said they recognised the Bhopal gas disaster was a tragic event and they have been briefed on the history of the incident.

"The IOC understands that Dow never owned or operated the facility in Bhopal, and that the State Government of Madhya Pradesh owns and controls the former plant site," said an IOC statement.

London 2012 chairman Sebastian Coe has also backed Dow.

"I am satisfied that the ownership, operation and the involvement either at the time of the disaster or at the final settlement was not the responsibility of Dow," said Coe, who has Indian blood due to his mother.

Dow has also expressed their disappointment that they have suddenly come under fire for an incident that they were not responsible for.

"It is disappointing and misguided that some people are trying to assign blame and responsibility to Dow," said a Dow spokesperson.

"Dow acquired the shares of Union Carbide Corporation more than 16 years after the tragedy, and 10 years after the settlement agreement – paid by Union Carbide Corporation and Union Carbide India, Limited – was approved by the Indian Supreme Court.

By Tom Degun

Source: www.insidethegames.biz

November 28 - Adidas have extended their sponsorship deal of the British Olympic Association (BOA) beyond London 2012 until Rio 2016, continuation of a partnership that started in 1983.

The new deal includes a sponsorship and a licensing deal under which adidas will receive marketing rights to Team GB.

In return the German sportswear manufacturer will provide the BOA with all of its sportswear requirements, including all competition and leisure wear for every athlete and team official participating at the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi as well as Rio.

They will also provide non-competition wear for all other Olympic youth festivals and Games.

The deal is made up of cash, value-in-kind and marketing support for kit launches.

Under the licensing deal, adidas will create and market exclusive Team GB licensed products that will be retailed to the British public.

"I am delighted that with over a year to go we have already secured our first tier one sponsorship deal for the 2013-2016 quadrennial," said Andy Hunt, the chief executive of the BOA.

"What makes it even more exciting is that it marks a significant kick-start to the British Olympic Association's post-2012 commercial programme.

"Adidas has been a highly valued supporter of the BOA for 28 years now.

"This makes them our longest serving partner and through this partnership, we will continue to mutually build and promote the Team GB brand as a valuable consumer and commercial entity.

"Our long partnership also means that adidas brings vast experience in terms of supplying high-performance sportswear for an incredibly diverse range of summer and winter Olympic sports.

"Furthermore, adidas provides Team GB with industry leading innovation and technology as well as operational and logistical support that is invaluable to an organisation with such complex supply requirements as the BOA.

"We are very proud to have a partner like adidas.

"For our athletes looking and feeling great certainly has an impact on performance and we are confident that with adidas on board, British athletes will not only continue to look and feel great, but they will also be wearing and competing in industry-leading products."

Adidas, who are also a Tier One sponsor of London 2012, claimed that the new deal illustrated its commitment to British sport beyond next year's Olympics.

"This unique partnership is one of the longest in British sporting history and demonstrates our unique multi-sport heritage and our continued on-going investment in sport throughout the UK," said Gil Steyaert, managing director of adidas Market North

"In addition, we are able to illustrate our leadership in product innovation across many specialist sports as well as  our rich legacy in the Games.

"No other brand has a more distinguished history or stronger connection with sport than adidas and we look forward to continuing our support for Team GB to 2016."

By Duncan Mackay

Source: www.insidethegames.biz

(ATR) A simmering battle of wills over the direction of a major Olympic body is now out in the open, a dispute called “vulgar” by one of the protagonists.

The issues: who will take command of the 204-member Association of National Olympic Committees in 2014 and who will represent the association on the IOC’s powerful Executive Board starting next year.

Mario Vazquez Rana has served as ANOC President for 30 years. His current term expires in 2014. But Vazquez will turn 80 in 2012, meaning his career as an IOC member comes to an end -- as well as his ability to continue serving on the IOC Executive Board as the ANOC representative.

European Olympic Committees President Patrick Hickey is leading a movement to see a successor for the ANOC EB seat named as early as next month. So far, Vazquez Rana has not signaled who he would like to succeed him on the EB, while Hickey tells Around the Rings that he wants the seat, subject to vote at the IOC Session next July in London.

Hickey says Vazquez Rana has not represented the interests of the National Olympic Committees on the EB as forcefully as Hickey believes should be done.

“I have spoken to many NOC leaders who say that we are losing ground against the international federations,” Hickey says.

He raised the concern publicly for the first time this week in his address to the EOC general assembly in Sochi.

“To insure a better future for all our members, I think we now have to make our voices heard on this,” said Hickey, proclaiming unhappiness from the world’s NOCs with the 2010 ANOC Assembly in Acapulco, as well as the Sports Ministers meeting held at the conclusion of the Acapulco meeting.

Responding to questions from ATR posed by email, Vazquez blasted Hickey’s speech and called into question his motives.

“I believe no other moment could be more inopportune to express such a diatribe of lies than now, when the Olympic Movement needs further unity, cohesion and a team spirit to carry out its mission to promote the Olympic principles and values worldwide and I truly regret it,” says the ANOC chief.

“When Mr. Hickey took over the EOC’s presidency, we had a respectful relationship of good collaboration, as was the case during President Rogge’s period. However, the lack of coincidence in our approaches and points of view began to be noticeable when Mr. Hickey’s excessive craving for power and his aspiration to different positions became evident, aspirations that have been frustrated over and over again,” said Vazquez referring to past attempts by the Irish sports leader to win an EB seat.

Hickey insists he is not gunning for the ANOC presidency or trying to oust Vazquez from the post.

“I did not call for him to step down,” Hickey says. “I fully expect that he will serve out his mandate until 2014. And then if someone wants to challenge him, that’s their prerogative.”

Hickey is meeting this weekend in Dubai with Olympic Council of Asia President Sheikh Ahmad and other IOC members from Asia to plot the next moves on the ANOC EB seat. They are seeking a decision on the EB nominee Dec. 6 when the ANOC Council, of which Hickey is one of five continental vice presidents, is scheduled to meet in Lausanne.

“Fireworks” is what one of the council members tells ATR he expects at the meeting.

Vazquez Rana tells ATR that the EB seat will be discussed at the meeting but that it will be up to the ANOC general assembly to decide on who replaces him on the EB when it meets in April. Vazquez Rana predicts failure for Hickey.

“In his wild mind he has given rise to a 'battle of succession' in which he intends to involve other directors of ANOC and the NOCs and confuse the public opinion. It seems it is not enough for him to aspire and lose, but that he enjoys tarnishing the name of a prestigious and strong Organization which should be very much above any aspiration of a person or group.

“The NOC representatives that participate in our General Assembly are experienced, they know how to elect their directors and have a very fine instinct to distinguish

honesty, virtue and merits from mediocrity, opportunism, disloyalty and a lack of the most basic ethical principles.

“Due to the fact that I know them and have had the honor to lead them for three decades, I know they will not allow themselves to be confused and that they will elect directors capable of maintaining the course of ANOC and strengthen its leadership as one of the Olympic Movement’s main pillars,” says Vazquez.

“I truly regret the situation provoked by Mr. Hickey, due to the fact that I am not used to deal with these issues through the media before doing so with my colleagues. It is not usual for me to use such a strong tone towards a person, but I had to do it because it was my duty and obligation and part of my responsibilities as ANOC President.

“Nothing and no one will be able to keep us away from the road we chose and much less selfish, ambitious and opportunistic persons who shield behind any excuse to divide and prosper at the expense of ANOC’s image and prestige,” he says to conclude his remarks .

Hickey says he would like to see Vazquez Rana leave ANOC gracefully by not seeking a new term in 2014.

“We would treat him royally, give him a proper send off,” he says.

While it is clear Hickey has his sights on the EB, he says other candidates are possible to succeed Vazquez Rana as ANOC president.

He mentions New Zealand’s Barry Maister, Robin Mitchell of Fiji or OCA chief Ahmad. But the Sheikh may not be available if he succeeds with his own ambitions to become prime minister of Kuwait. And while he is popular and youthful, one IOC member tells ATR that Ahmad can’t be a credible candidate as long as the Kuwait Olympic Committee remains under suspension by the IOC over Kuwaiti law the IOC says intrudes on the autonomy of the NOC, in violation of the Olympic Charter. The suspension has been in effect since last year.

By Ed Hula

Source: www.aroundtherings.com

November 24 - Reigning 1000 metre sprint kayak Olympic champion Tim Brabants (pictured) has told insidethegames that he "fully supports" the British Olympic Association (BOA) bylaw preventing athletes convicted of doping offences from competing in the subsequent Games, adding that he would not want to be part of the same team as sprinter Dwain Chambers, who is still hoping to compete at London 2012.

Chambers is hoping that the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruling last month, which determined that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) could not ban athletes who had been convicted of anti-doping offences and suspended for more than six months from the next Olympics, will give him the opportunity to compete at the Games next year.

The CAS outcome nullified the IOC's rule 45 – or Osaka rule – and meant that US 400m sprint champion LaShawn Merritt could compete at London 2012, while also increasing pressure on the BOA to scrap their own bylaw, which prevents drugs cheats competing for their country at future Olympics.

The bylaw has become an increasing bone of contention between the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the BOA, with CAS reaching its decision last month on the basis that WADA regulations only allow for a maximum of a two year ban for drug cheats.

Speaking at the launch of Team EDF – of which he is a member – at London's Tower Bridge yesterday, Brabants hit out at this two year ban, saying that it was insufficient in itself, and believes the BOA's own bylaw does not go far enough.

The sprint kayaker, who left the sport after winning gold in Beijing in 2008, is also a doctor, and so brings a medical perspective to the debate.

"I don't believe those athletes aren't still gaining from cheating [after serving their suspension]," he told insidethegames.

"You may have a two year ban but you're still benefiting from that bulk and that strength that you gained from cheating – it doesn't seem fair.

"I'm very clear on that matter; I fully support the BOA bylaw.

"I don't believe it's fair that athletes who cheated to improve their performance should be allowed to represent their country in sport ever again, let alone at the Olympics.

"To go away for two years and come back is not much of a discouragement.

"What's discouraging you from taking that risk?"

Though the main point of contention over the bylaw is that it is not consistent with WADA's regulations, Brabants feels that this reasoning is "crazy".

"Just because it is not consistent with what everyone else is doing does not mean it is wrong," he insisted.

"I think as an athlete as well I like being involved in an organisation where we have such stringent, tough punishments for cheats.

"I don't understand why WADA are wasting money and time opposing the ruling.

"They should spend their money trying to find more cheats – not trying to force the BOA to drop their bylaw.

"Some athletes talk about restriction of trade, [but] what about restriction of trade for athletes knocked out by cheating athletes who may give up the sport if they think they can't make it unless they cheat?

"So there is a restriction of trade on both sides if that is their argument – if you cheat why should you be allowed to ever represent your country?"

Though he adds that the BOA's appeals process in the case of a genuine misunderstanding is vital, the 2007 world champion insists he does not want to be on the same team as Chambers (pictured) or anyone else who is found guilty of taking drugs.

"I don't want to be on a Team GB alongside people who have cheated.

"[I have] no interest in being on a team with him [Chambers].

"I know it sounds harsh but he took drugs to boost his performance and was quite happy to represent our country and stand on the podium to collect his medals.

"I think other Team GB athletes feel the same way."

Away from the bylaw controversy, Brabants is still waiting to qualify for the Games next year, but told insidethegames that he was "very confident" that he would be competing in London next year.

"Barring any accidents or injuries I see no reason why I won't be there as long as I can avoid having surgery like I did at this time last year," he said, adding that he was "definitely" looking to retain his gold medal.

He also said that having had time off after Beijing, before deciding to come back to the sport ahead of the London 2012 Games, he had been able to train harder than before because of the break he gave his body.

"Having a break gave my body a chance to repair itself so you can train harder when you come back into it," Brabants explained.

"So actually I changed training for the better in a positive way.

"Having had a break you lose weight and muscle and I really look forward to getting the fitness and strength back and look to build myself into a better shape than before."

By David Gold

Source: www.insidethegames.biz

November 23 - Deep divisions have emerged in the relationship between Mario Vazquez Raña, President of the Association of National Olympic Committees (ANOC), and Europe, who want him to step down.

Patrick Hickey, President of the European Olymic Committees (EOC), used his opening address at the organisation's 40th General Assembly here to express his dissatisfaction at the Mexican's leadership of ANOC, the umbrella organisation of the world's National Olympic Committees (NOCs).

"ANOC is in the situation at the moment where there seems to be perpetual conflict between the international federations and NOCs," Hickey told insidethegames.

"Many of the NOCs in the room here are deeply unhappy at the leadership of ANOC at addressing all these problems."

ANOC was founded in 1979 and under Raña has grown from 144 members to 205.

But the belief among many of the 49 countries of the EOC is that it has lost its way.

"They were not very enthused at the last ANOC General Assembly in Acapaulco," said Hickey.

It is claimed that the behaviour of Raña, who also heads Olympic Solidarity, the IOC programme that distributes nearly $400 million (£257 million/€299 million) to NOCs around the globe, has become increasingly erratic in recent months.

There is particular anger about an incident last month in Guadalajara on the eve of the Pan American Games where Raña allegedly publicly humilated Christophe De Kepper, the director general of the IOC.

It followed the failure of the IOC President Jacques Rogge to attend the final day of the Pan American Sports Organization Assembly after he had changed his travel plans because Raña had originally cancelled it before changing his mind.

Raña, a billionaire who is the President and director general of Organización Editorial Mexicana, the largest newspaper company in Latin America, is currently due to continue as the head of ANOC until 2014.

But pressure on him to step down is set to intensify when the ANOC Executive Board holds its next meeting in Lausanne on December 6.

There they will discuss who should replace Raña as ANOC's representative on the IOC's ruling Executive Board when his current mandate ends at the Session in London next July.

He ceases to be a member of the IOC at the end of 2012 because he will have reached the compulsory retirement age of 80 and attempts by him to negotiate with Rogge a special dispensation to be allowed to continue beyond have fallen on deaf ears.

The favourite to succeed Raña on the Executive Board is Sheikh Ahmad Al-Fahad Al-Sabah, President of the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA).

Hickey is scheduled to travel from here to Dubai to meet Al-Sabah to discuss their strategy, insidethegames understands.

"I'm in constant contact with my colleagues in the other continents to find a solution to this because we should all be playing on the one team," said Hickey.

By Duncan Mackay

Source: www.insidethegames.biz